7 months)" (Compendium 2004, 112).The Commission reported in 2004 that "[r]evising the crack cocaine thresholds would better reduce the [sentencing] gap than any other single policy change, and it would dramatically improve the fairness of the federal sentencing system" (USSC 2004, 132). As a result, the African-American community's "[p]erceived improper racial disparity fosters disrespect for and lack of confidence in the criminal justice system..." (USSC 2002, 103).
There is proposed legislation seeking to reduce the differences between sentencing for possession of crack and powder cocaine, but this would still result in large numbers of Blacks being incarcerated. In fact, the majority of powder defendants are Hispanics (as seen in the table above), so decreasing the amount of powder required to trigger mandatory sentencing would not eliminate racial and ethnic disparity, as Hispanics may become the ones so discriminated against.
Conclusion
The reason for the large numbers of racially discriminatory sentencing is the passage of a law in 1986 for simple possession of a small amount of crack cocaine that made Black defendants much more liable to spend time in prison, if they were street dealers of crack cocaine, rather than dealing powder, which, it has been shown, is essentially the same drug, as Blacks are the largest users of crack and the sentence for possession of crack is extremely high, compared to other offenses. As the Commission noted in a report to Congress in 1997, "federal cocaine policy inappropriately targets limited federal resources by placing the quantity triggers for the five-year mandatory minimum penalty for crack cocaine too low" (USSC 1997, 7).
Works Cited
BJS, [Bureau of Justice Statistics] Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, 1994 (Washington, DC: March 1998) Table 6.11, p. 85.
BJS, Compendium of Federal Justice Statistics, 2003. Washington, DC: Oct....
2004. Table 7.16, p. 112.
Compendium of Federal Statistics, 2003. Oct. 2004, Table 7.16, p. 112.
Drugs and Racial Discrimination." New York Times; Editorial Desk, Late Edition - Final, Section a, Page 30, January 12, 2006.
Federal Crack Cocaine Sentencing: Race and class penalties in crack cocaine sentencing." The Sentencing Project. Washington, D.C. 2007, http://www.sentencingproject.org/Admin/Documents/publications/dp_cracksentencing.pdf.
Hatsukami, Dorothy K., and Fischman, Marian W., "Crack Cocaine and Cocaine Hydrochloride: Are the Differences Myth or Reality?" Journal of the American Medical Association, November 20, 1996.
Lockwood, Dorothy; Pottieger, Anne E.and Inciardi, James a. "Crack Use, Crime by Crack Users, and Ethnicity," Darnell F. Hawkins' (ed.)., Ethnicity, Race and Crime. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995, p.21.
Mauer, Marc. "The disparity on crack-cocaine sentencing." The Boston Globe. July 5, 2006.
Schuster, Charles. Testimony of Charles Schuster before the Subcommittee on Crime and Drugs of the Senate Judiciary Committee, May 22, 2002.
Sentencing Project: Research and Advocacy for Reform. Washington, D.C., 2007, http://www.sentencingproject.org/Publications.aspx?IssueID=3.
State Rates of Incarceration by State." The Sentencing Project 2004. Washington, D.C., 2004
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration," 2004 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, Population Estimates 1995, Washington, DC: Sept. 2005, Table 1.43a.
Testimony of Commissioner John R. Steer." Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources, May 11, 2000.
U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Cocaine Offenses: An analysis of Crack and Powder Penalties, March 17, 2002.
USSC, Special Report to Congress: Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy, (April…
